The steering committee on the establishment of state police has explained why it recommended a 60 month timeline for the successful take off of the programme.
According to the committee’s report, the 60 month timeline was due to the massive scale of reforms involved, pointing out that a shorter time line would be too risky for the exercise.
The committee, headed by the Director-General of the National Institute of Police Studies, Prof. Olu Ogunsakin, was inaugurated by the inspector general of police on March 4.
The eight-man team was saddled with the responsibility of creating an operational framework for state police within one month.
It was also expected to oversee the implementation of state-level policing to complement the federal force in addressing the rising national security concerns.
Part of the committee’s assignment was also to propose frameworks for recruitments, training and resources generation to strengthen internal security.
The committee explained that rushed transfers of officers could weaken federal police capacity, thus creating security vacuums during national threats or inter-state crimes.
It also said that inadequate time for infrastructure (facilities, digital systems) and training would lead to under-equipped and ineffective state forces being prone to failures.
The committee further stated that insufficient preparation for oversight bodies like the National Police Standard Board (NPSB) and state commissions risked poor compliance and uneven standards across all the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
According to the committee, constitutional amendments and new laws need deliberate National Assembly processes.
“Hastening invites legal challenges and delays. Faster timelines heighten chances of elite capture, politicisation or abuse before safeguard matures, thus eroding public trust.
”The 60-month timeline systematically addresses rollout risks through structured phasing, built-in reviews and resource allocation.
”Months 1-12 prioritise constitutional amendments and oversight creation (NPSB, State Commissions), avoiding rushed laws that invite court challenges or uneven adoption across states.
”Months 13-24 handle voluntary transfers with exemptions and incentives, preserving federal capacity while preventing mass disruptions —unlike shorter plans that can hollow out national policing.
”Months 25-48 allow state-specific recruitment, facilities and joint operations testing, reducing equipment shortages or untrained deployments.
Read also:
- Written examination for police recruitment holds April 28–30, PSC warns against scams
- 2025/2026 Police Recruitment: Lagos Command announces screening date, venue, requirements for Constable applicants
- Police Recruitment Extended as Application Gap Widens: Lagos, Anambra, others lag behind in 50,000 Constable exercise
”Months 49-60 include NPSB audits, compliance penalties and public feedback loops to catch politicisation or gaps early, ensuring stability over hasty full rollout,’’ the committee stated.
It, however, rejected the shorter timelines (e.g., 24 months) due to what it called potential elite capture, uneven state readiness and federal police weakening, adding that 60 months would ensure stability, audits and adjustments across phases.
The committee recommended transferring approximately 60 per cent of current Nigeria Police Force personnel to the proposed 37 State Police Services.
It said that voluntary transfer programme would, however, be adopted in ensuring that officers opt to move to home states or preferred states, with no forced transfers.
The committee also recommended incentives, including three-month salary grant, transition training, guaranteed pension continuity and career counseling for officers.
It equally recommended special considerations for officers near retirement (within five years), on medical leave, in conflict zones or female personnel with family needs.
Why we adopted 60-month timeline for roll out of state police – Steering committee
