The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has slammed the All Progressives Congress (APC) for celebrating the commissioning of residential quarters for judges, describing it as a shame, unethical and inappropriate spectacle that further erodes public confidence in the independence of the judiciary.
Key Highlights:
According to the ADC, the provision of houses for judges is a constitutional obligations of government, funded by the Nigerian taxpayers.
This was contained in a statement issued on Thursday, by the ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi.
The party therefore condemned the impression being created by the executive arm of government, by presenting itself as the benefactor of another constitutionally independent arm.
Read Also:
- ADC South-East Rejects Tinubu’s Endorsement, Says Ndigbo Will Not Reward Failure In 2027
- Kwara ADC Governorship Candidate Mourns Monarch
- ADC Chieftain Berates Kenneth Okonkwo For Critizing Amaechi’s Choice As Atiku’s Running Mate
It declared that neither President Bola Tinubu nor the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Nyesom Wike, is entitled to personal acclaim for discharging responsibilities financed from public funds.
“What the APC has done, by awarding personal acclaim to both the president and his minister for building houses for judges is to create the impression that the welfare of judges is subject to the whims and caprice of government officials or to executive benevolence.
“In every constitutional democracy governed by the principle of separation of powers, the judiciary must never be placed in a position where its welfare can be publicly portrayed as a favour granted by political actors whose actions and interests may ultimately come before the courts.
“What makes this development particularly troubling is the APC’s attempt to glorify Tinubu and Wike as patrons of the judiciary.
“This action alone creates the unmistakable appearance that judicial welfare is dependent on executive benevolence rather than constitutional entitlement.
“It sends the wrong signal to Nigerians and inevitably raises legitimate concerns about the proper boundaries between the executive and the judiciary.
This is particularly disturbing given the widespread perception that the president and Wike already wield undue influence over the judiciary.
“The statement by the ruling party celebrating the duo can only give further credence to this belief. Afterall, he who pays the piper dictates the tune.
“It is noteworthy that the APC attempted to portray the project as part of government efforts to strengthen judicial independence. Judicial independence is not achieved by the number of buildings commissioned by politicians.
“Rather, it is measured by institutional autonomy, financial independence, security of tenure, freedom from political pressure and the confidence of citizens that judges are accountable only to the constitution and the law,” the ADC said.
The party added that in a political climate where election petitions, constitutional disputes and matters involving powerful government officials are routinely determined by the courts, public officials ought to exercise the highest degree of restraint.
lt added that public institutions must not be transformed into monuments of political patronage or instruments for cultivating judicial gratitude.
The ADC called on the judiciary to be wary of the ethical implications of its relationship with the government, adding that already, the judiciary has suffered a massive trust deficit.
