The United States Department of Defense has announced plans to livestream the execution of former US Army Major Nidal Hasan, who was convicted of killing 13 people in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting in Texas. The execution has been scheduled for December 3, 2026, at Fort Hood, following President Donald Trump’s approval of the death sentence and the Army’s announcement of the execution date. The proposed broadcast has sparked controversy over the legality, ethics and public impact of livestreaming a military execution.
Key Highlights
- The US Department of Defense plans to livestream Nidal Hasan’s execution.
- Hasan is scheduled to be executed by firing squad on December 3, 2026, at Fort Hood, Texas.
- President Donald Trump approved the death sentence following a recommendation from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.
- Hasan was convicted of killing 13 people and injuring 32 others in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting.
- Critics have raised concerns about the ethics, legality and consequences of broadcasting an execution.
- Legal experts have questioned the implications of allowing the public to watch a military execution online.
- If carried out, the execution would be the first by the US military in more than 60 years.
Pentagon Confirms Livestream of Nidal Hasan’s Execution
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the administration intended to make Hasan’s execution public, arguing that people should understand the consequences of serious crimes.
A Pentagon official separately confirmed that the execution would be livestreamed, making the proposed broadcast an unprecedented development in modern US military justice.
Speaking to conservative media outlet Real America’s Voice, Hegseth said Hasan would face a firing squad, describing the punishment as appropriate for the crime.
The announcement has drawn attention because executions in the United States are not ordinarily broadcast live to the general public. Questions remain about how the proposed livestream would operate and what safeguards, if any, would restrict access.
What Happened in the 2009 Fort Hood Shooting?
Hasan, a former Army psychiatrist from Virginia, was convicted over the November 5, 2009, shooting at Fort Hood, a US military installation in Texas.
He opened fire inside a crowded military medical facility, killing 13 people and injuring 32 others. The attack became the deadliest non-combat shooting on a US military base.
Hasan was found guilty by a military jury in 2013 and sentenced to death. He admitted in court that he was responsible for the shooting.
The case has remained a major issue in debates about military justice, the death penalty and accountability for attacks against members of the armed forces.
Trump Approves Death Sentence as Army Sets Execution Date
President Donald Trump approved Hasan’s death sentence on October 2, 2026, according to an announcement published by the US Army. The Army subsequently set December 3 as the execution date, with the execution scheduled to take place at Fort Hood.
The Army said the decision followed the completion of the appellate process that upheld Hasan’s conviction and death sentence. The US Supreme Court had denied his request to review the court-martial conviction in March 2025.
The planned execution would mark a rare use of the military death penalty, which has not been carried out in the United States since 1961.
Livestream Plan Sparks Legal and Ethical Concerns
The decision to broadcast the execution has prompted questions about whether livestreaming a military execution is legally permissible and how the authorities would control access to the footage.
Legal experts have described the proposed broadcast as unprecedented in the modern United States. Concerns include the dignity of the condemned person, the potential impact on viewers and the possibility that an execution could be turned into a public spectacle.
The plan has also raised questions about age restrictions. Under US Army Regulation 190-55, people under 18 are not permitted to witness military executions. The BBC reported that it had asked the Pentagon and the US Army whether those restrictions would apply to the livestream and what steps would be taken to prevent minors from viewing it.
The authorities’ response to those questions could help determine how the proposed broadcast is organised.
Read also:
- Trump Approves Firing Squad Execution of Nidal Hasan, First US Military Execution in 65 Years
- Tennessee Prison Chief Resigns After Failed Execution Of Christa Pike
- Pentagon Launches Project Meridian With Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey, Newt Gingrich
Politicians and Critics Question Public Broadcast
The proposed livestream has faced criticism from people who argue that making an execution available online could undermine human dignity and expose audiences, including young viewers, to disturbing material.
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy condemned the proposal in an interview with CNN, comparing the idea of broadcasting an execution to public displays of violence associated with extremist groups.
Supporters of the punishment, however, have argued that the execution should demonstrate the consequences of the crime.
The debate has placed the Trump administration’s approach to capital punishment under renewed scrutiny, particularly as the government considers making an execution visible to a much wider audience than the limited group normally permitted to attend.
Fort Hood Survivor Supports Execution but Questions Livestream
Alonzo Lunsford, a former US Army sergeant who survived the Fort Hood shooting after being shot seven times, said he supported Hasan’s execution by firing squad.
Speaking to the BBC’s Today programme, Lunsford said he intended to attend the execution and wanted Hasan to look him in the eyes before the sentence was carried out.
However, he expressed reservations about allowing the general public to watch the livestream, particularly because of the message such a broadcast could send to younger viewers.
His position reflects a broader debate over whether victims, survivors and families should be allowed to witness an execution, and whether that access should extend to a worldwide online audience.
First US Military Execution in More Than 60 Years
If carried out as scheduled, Hasan’s execution would be the first US military execution since 1961. It would also be the first US military firing-squad execution since January 1945, when Army Private Eddie Slovik was executed for desertion during World War II.
The rarity of military executions has added to the significance of the case. The planned livestream would introduce a further departure from established practice by potentially allowing members of the public to watch the execution remotely.
The proposal is also likely to intensify discussions about capital punishment, public access to state executions and the boundaries between government transparency and the protection of human dignity.
Death Penalty Debate Continues in the United States
The planned execution comes amid continuing debate over the use of capital punishment in the United States. Supporters argue that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for the most serious crimes, while opponents raise concerns about human rights, the risk of wrongful convictions and the ethics of state-sanctioned killing.
The decision to livestream Hasan’s execution adds another dimension to that debate, shifting attention from the punishment itself to how the government intends to present it to the public.
Although December 3, 2026, has been announced as the execution date, the planned broadcast has already prompted questions about access, safeguards and the legal framework governing public viewing.
For more global news and updates, follow us on X.
