Recent findings show Bigmouth Buffalo fish have perplexingly long lives and appear to get healthier as they age. But scientists are worried their population is about to crash.
If you ever find yourself on the shores of Minnesota’s Rice Lake in May time, you may be able to spot swarms of large fish bodies mingling among the wild rice plants in water barely a few feet deep.
These are Bigmouth Buffalo fish, and they are the world’s longest-lived freshwater fish. Some live for over 100 years. Every year, these huge fish – which can weigh more than 50lb (23kg) – traverse through Rice River to spawn and reproduce in the lake.
But the regularity of this spawning belies a hidden conservation concern: for more than six decades now, no new generations of young fish here have made it to adulthood. Bigmouth Buffalo have remained understudied for decades. In the last few years, however, scientists have begun to realise how unique these huge and incredibly long-lived fish truly are – even as they also uncover how imperiled they may be.
Bigmouth Buffalo fish are native to North America and can be found from Southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba in Canada, all the way down to Louisiana and Texas in the US. They’re often viewed by the public and anglers as “rough fish” – a long-lived but non-scientific term used to imply that they’re not particularly desirable – since they’re not commercially fished and therefore not economically important.
It’s this view of Bigmouth Buffalo that has long led them to be overlooked by scientists. Over the last five years, however, researchers have made a spate of new and surprising discoveries about them.
For one thing, individuals have been documented to reach up to 127 years of age, making them the world’s longest-lived freshwater fish. They also don’t seem to decline biologically with age. Most recently, researchers have realised that their stable population sizes over recent decades could be thanks to the fact that these old fish are not dying, even as they fail to produce young that survive into adulthood.
The few experts who study these fish worry that a severe drop in their population may be imminent, if not unavoidable. What’s clear from the research so far is just how little we know about Bigmouth Buffalo, and how many unanswered questions remain.
“It’s one of the oldest populations of animal in the world, and there’s no management or protection of the species,” says Alec Lackmann, a fish researcher at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, and one of the foremost experts on Bigmouth Buffalo fish and their ageing.
Lackmann led the research, published in a 2019 paper, which first discovered the centenarian lifespan of Bigmouth Buffalo in Minnesota. Prior to this, it was thought that the fish only lived to be about 26 years old. He later confirmed large numbers of centenarian individuals in other Buffalo fish species in other parts of North America.
Lackmann’s interest in these fish is a departure from his previous doctoral research, which involved studying non-biting midge flies in the Alaskan Arctic. Out of curiosity, he took some ichthyology (fish zoology) courses and learned how to determine the age of fish using the otolith, the stone-like structures found in the ears of most fish species.
Otoliths grow rings over time, like those of a tree. By dissecting them into thin slices, scientists can count and analyse these rings and get an accurate look at a fish’s age.
When he moved back to Minnesota, again following curiosity, Lackmann began dissecting the otoliths of the native species around him. “The first Bigmouth Buffalo I aged was almost 90 years old,” he says. “I was like ‘wow, holy smokes’… It was hard to believe at first.”
The discovery led Lackmann to ask more questions about this strange but little-known fish. A couple of years later, he collaborated with experts in biological aging to assess known markers of stress and aging in Bigmouth Buffalo fish of various ages.
The researchers looked at immune cell ratios as well as the length of telomeres (a region DNA found at the end of a chromosome which limit the number of times a cell can divide), both indicators of biological ageing, and compared them with the otoliths rings showing the true age of the fish.
The research, published in 2021, only provided a snapshot of each fish’s health at one moment in time, says Britt Heidinger, co-author of the paper and a biologist at North Dakota State University, who focuses on why organisms age at different rates. But it suggested that “we’re really not seeing a decline with age in these organisms”, she says.
Read Also: Is privatization of Nigerian refineries the way forward?
Increased age in the fish was not associated with telomere shortening (a biological sign of ageing), as would normally be expected. Instead, it seemed to be linked with better immune functioning, including a decreased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio – a change which suggests that these fish get better at handling bodily stress and see increased immunity as they age.
There’s still a lot that’s not known about how these fish manage to stay healthy in old age, says Heidinger, but it’s possible that they might be maintaining their telomeres through an enzyme that prevents these from shortening. Unfortunately, however, telomeres can’t tell us what the maximum lifespan of the bigmouth fish might be or give assurances that the trend of getting better with age will continue. After all, “ageing is a non-linear process”, Heidinger says.
But there is another puzzle unfolding in this recent research. Since such a high proportion of the fish sampled were exceptionally old, it begged another question: where are all the younger fish?
Lackmann and collaborators decided to sample fish ages in Minnesota’s Rice Lake, while also annually observing spawning behaviours. In a recent paper, they reported that 99.7 percent of the fish they had sampled and aged – 389 out of 390 fish – were more than 50 years old. The median age was 79, meaning most of the fish in this population were born before the end of World War Two.
But what was really shocking was the fact that despite Bigmouth Buffalo fish successfully spawning every year around May, yielding many new young fish, by late summer all evidence of those young disappears. In fact, there hasn’t been a successful generation of young fish there for more than 60 years, says Lackmann. “Every young fish that has survived after 1957 is a statistical outlier.”
The researchers believe the reason for this dismal survival rate is likely predation by another native fish: pike. These also spawn in Rice Lake, just a little earlier in the year, so it’s likely that young pike fish are predating on the baby buffalo fish, says Lackmann.
The scientists theorise that the inordinately long lives of the fish are in fact an adaptation to the fact that their young only succeed once in a long while. But more research is needed to know for sure.
Courtesy BBC
