Public reactions remain divided following the continued detention of Nigerian entrepreneur, Linus Williams, popularly known as Blord over allegations of cyber impersonation involving activist Martins Vincent Otse, aka, VeryDarkMan.
Blord is currently being held at the Kuje Correctional Centre, after pleading not guilty to charges filed against him on April 1, 2026.
The case has drawn widespread attention across Nigeria’s digital and legal spaces, with prosecutors alleging that he unlawfully used VeryDarkMan’s identity and image to promote products and falsely project a ₦500 million endorsement deal.
According to case details, the controversy began when allegations emerged that Blord used VeryDarkMan’s persona to enhance the credibility of commercial promotions.
Authorities also claim the disputed ₦500 million endorsement arrangement played a central role in the alleged fraud-related representation.
Read also:
- I’ll send you to prison if you impersonate me like Blord, VeryDarkMan to Sowore
- Blord remanded in Kuje Prison over alleged forgery, unauthorized use of VeryDarkMan’s identity
- King Mitchy responds after VeryDarkMan criticizes her apology following NGO donation controversy
Police sources maintain that multiple invitations were extended to Blord for questioning, which were not honoured, eventually leading to his arrest. Law enforcement officials have defended the move as necessary to ensure compliance with ongoing investigations.
Following his arraignment, Blord’s legal team applied for bail, arguing that the offences are bailable and that the defendant is prepared to cooperate with investigators.
However, the police have opposed the application, citing concerns about possible interference with witnesses and the integrity of the investigation. The opposition has so far prevented his release, leaving him in custody pending further judicial consideration.
Activist Omoyele Sowore has criticised Blord’s continued detention, arguing that the matter could have been treated as a civil dispute rather than a criminal case. His intervention has added further momentum to ongoing debates about police powers and pre-trial detention in Nigeria.
Meanwhile, VeryDarkMan’s position has also evolved. He was initially reported to be open to withdrawing opposition to bail, but later aligned with the view that due legal process should continue, especially given the seriousness of the allegations.
The case has sparked intense discussions on X, with users expressing contrasting views.
While some argue that accountability is necessary if identity misuse is proven, others believe the detention is excessive and should be handled through civil litigation.
Critics have also questioned the police’s strong opposition to bail, while supporters insist the investigation must be allowed to proceed without interference.
@JohnEze said “If Blord truly used someone’s identity to secure deals, then he should face the law. Influencers must be accountable.”
@DanielRegha said “One minute you claim to be an activist fighting for the poor, the next minute you’re seated with the rich in the midst of the people who oppress the poor”.
@John32226 said “I was a very big fan of VDM btw…until I clocked he’s a manipulator.
I love that he’s helping people and standing for justice from our wicked politicians but he’s someone that doesn’t see anything good from anyone if he’s not the one leading it.
The court is expected to rule on the pending bail application as proceedings continue. Until then, Blord remains in custody at the Kuje Correctional Centre, while the case continues to attract national attention and intense public debate.
