The proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has distanced itself from one Nwaogu Ihechimere Ezeakolam, a retired operative of the Department of State Services (DSS), who was arraigned before an Abuja Federal High Court on Thursday.
Key Highlights
- IPOB denies any affiliation with retired DSS operative Nwaogu Ihechimere Ezeakolam.
- Ezeakolam was arraigned before a Federal High Court in Abuja on a four-count terrorism-related charge for allegedly providing support to IPOB.
- The group says Ezeakolam is not an IPOB member, officer, representative, or agent.
- IPOB challenges the DSS to present evidence linking the suspect to the organisation.
- The group criticises the decision to remand Ezeakolam in Kuje Prison, alleging it could be aimed at gathering intelligence.
Ezeakolam was arraigned on a 4-count charge before Justice Mohammed Garba Umar for allegedly rendering support and material assistance to IPOB, contrary to and punishable under Section 13 of Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, 2022.
However, reacting to the development on Friday, IPOB in a statement by spokesman Emma Powerful, said it does not know the suspect, warning the DSS to stop dragging IPOB into its propaganda operations.
“IPOB does not know this man. He is not an IPOB officer, operative, representative or agent known to our command structure.
“Whatever issues exist between him and his former employers are matters for them. The DSS must stop using IPOB’s name as a convenient label for its internal dramas,” the group said.
The statement expressed concern that “another stranger has been linked to IPOB” even when the court has not determined the allegations.
According to IPOB, the DSS should provide evidence that Ezeakolam is a member of the group as alleged.
IPOB raised suspicion over the decision to remand Ezeakolam in Kuje Prison, noting that the move could be a covert operation to infiltrate the custodial centre and obtain information.
The pro-Biafra group warned the DSS and the Nigerian Correctional Service that any attempt by any person—serving or retired officer, agent or informant—to falsely present himself as connected to IPOB in order to penetrate or compromise persons in custody will be exposed.
It stressed that nobody should assume a person to be an IPOB member merely because the DSS has accused him of being one.
IPOB in the same vein said it has observed that whenever attention shifts toward developments favourable to Nnamdi Kanu or IPOB, “another convenient IPOB story emerges: an arrest, a surrender, a raid, a parade of weapons, or a stranger suddenly labelled commander, financier or operative. The script is exhausted”.
The pro-Biafra group expressed regrets that the type of attention given to issues allegedly concerning IPOB was not displayed when worshippers were abducted recently at St. Joseph Catholic Church, Inoyi, Affa, Udi Local Government Area of Enugu State.
Read also:
- Kanu Dismisses Lawyer, Withdraws Authority To Represent IPOB, Family
- Nnamdi Kanu Rejected Transfer From Sokoto Prison To Abuja, Wife Reveals
Stating its position, IPOB insisted that the retired DSS operative, Ezeakolam, “does not speak for IPOB, does not represent IPOB, holds no position known to IPOB and IPOB has not authorised him to act on its behalf.
“IPOB has no organisational connection with this individual whatsoever. If the DSS alleges otherwise, let it prove the allegation in court while respecting his presumption of innocence.
“We demand independent verification of his identity and reported background, transparency on the circumstances of his remand, and evidence—not assertions—for any alleged IPOB link. We further call for scrutiny of the decision to remand a purported former intelligence operative inside Kuje.
“Stop dragging IPOB into every DSS operation. Stop manufacturing connections where none exist. Stop using IPOB as the permanent diversionary headline,” the statement added.
