A social media debate has erupted between Nigerian commentator Daniel Regha and activist-lawyer Deji Adeyanju following remarks about Nigerians’ electricity needs.
The controversy began after Adeyanju appeared on the Honest Bunch Podcast, where he argued that Nigerians are not necessarily demanding round-the-clock electricity.
According to him, most citizens simply want stable power during crucial hours, particularly from evening to early morning, suggesting that full 24-hour supply may not be necessary or even affordable for many households.
However, Regha strongly disagreed, describing the position as unrealistic and disconnected from everyday struggles.
He argued that uninterrupted electricity is essential not only for comfort but also for economic productivity, stressing that many Nigerians rely heavily on power supply to run businesses.
Regha further pointed out that inconsistent electricity contributes to rising production costs, which in turn drives up the prices of goods, especially food.
Read Also:
- Deji Adeyanju blasts Tinubu over fuel hike, demands subsidy return
- Deji Adeyanju says he will vote Tinubu over Peter Obi in 2027 if opposition picks Ex-Anambra Governor
- Peter Obi drags Deji Adeyanju to court over defamatory remarks
He maintained that electricity should be treated as a basic social amenity rather than a luxury, criticizing the current system where supply is categorized into different service bands.
On his part, Adeyanju insisted that Nigerians are relatively easy to satisfy when it comes to electricity expectations.
He suggested that prioritizing power supply during peak household hours while redirecting energy to industrial use could be a practical approach.
The exchange has since sparked wider conversations online about Nigeria’s power sector, affordability of electricity, and whether citizens should demand full-time supply or settle for consistent, limited-hour access.
