The conflict between Israel and Iran, a decades-long rivalry rooted in ideological, geopolitical, and military tensions, has once again erupted into a dangerous escalation. As of June 13, 2025, both nations are engaged in a new wave of direct military strikes, with Israel targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities and military infrastructure, and Iran retaliating with missile barrages on Israeli cities. This latest chapter in their unending war has not only intensified regional instability but also drawn global attention, particularly with U.S. President Donald Trump issuing stark warnings to Iran. The convergence of renewed attacks, failed nuclear negotiations, and Trump’s rhetoric risks plunging the Middle East into a broader conflict.
The Israel-Iran conflict is a complex web of proxy wars, covert operations, and direct confrontations. Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution set the stage for enmity, as the new regime under Ayatollah Khomeini rejected Israel’s existence and supported anti-Israel groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israel, in turn, viewed Iran’s growing influence and nuclear ambitions as existential threats. Over the years, the two nations clashed indirectly through Iran-backed militias in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, and Israeli airstrikes on Iranian targets in the region. Direct exchanges, however, were rare until recent years, with 2024 marking the first instances of open missile and drone attacks between them.
The current escalation began on June 13, 2025, when Israel launched a massive air campaign against over 100 Iranian targets, including nuclear sites, ballistic missile factories, and military command centers. The strikes killed senior Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists, dealing a significant blow to Tehran’s capabilities. Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks, killing at least four Israelis in the Galilee region and damaging infrastructure in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Both sides have vowed to intensify their assaults, ignoring international calls for restraint.
At the heart of the conflict lies Iran’s nuclear program, which Israel sees as an existential threat. For years, Israel has advocated preemptive strikes to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, while Iran insists its program is for peaceful purposes. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a nuclear deal negotiated under President Barack Obama, briefly eased tensions, but Trump’s withdrawal from the agreement in 2018 during his first term reignited the crisis.
Read also:
- Trump urges Iran to make nuclear deal, warning of ‘more brutal’ attacks
- FG condems Israel’s attacks on Iran, calls for truce
- Israeli Ambassador warns of Iran’s influence in Nigeria over anniversary of Hamas massacre
In 2025, Trump, now in his second term, attempted to broker a new nuclear deal with Iran, offering a 60-day ultimatum to curb uranium enrichment. Negotiations, set to resume in Oman on June 15, showed initial promise, with Iran’s senior adviser Ali Shamkhani expressing conditional willingness to negotiate. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, skeptical of diplomacy and viewing Iran as vulnerable, pressed for military action. Israel’s strikes on Iran’s Natanz nuclear site, which caused damage but no reported casualties, effectively scuttled the talks.
President Trump’s role in the crisis has been both central and contradictory. Initially, he urged Israel to delay strikes to give diplomacy a chance, publicly stating his desire to avoid “violence like people haven’t seen before.” However, as negotiations faltered, Trump’s tone shifted. After Israel’s attacks, he praised them as “excellent” and warned Iran of “more to come,” threatening an overwhelming U.S. response if Iran targeted American interests. In a phone interview with Reuters, Trump claimed he was fully aware of Israel’s plans, suggesting tacit U.S. approval despite official statements from Secretary of State Marco Rubio denying direct involvement.
The U.S. has taken precautionary measures, evacuating some personnel from Iraq and authorizing the voluntary departure of military families from the Middle East, signaling fears of Iranian retaliation against U.S. assets. Iran has warned that Washington, as Israel’s primary ally, would face consequences for any Israeli aggression, raising the specter of a wider regional war.
Trump’s domestic base is fractured over the conflict. Hawkish figures like Senator Lindsey Graham have lauded Israel’s actions, calling the strikes “one of the most impressive military strikes in Israeli history.” Conversely, conservative voices within the MAGA movement, such as Tucker Carlson and Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, have criticized U.S. support for Israel’s actions, advocating for non-interventionism and questioning the risk of entanglement in another Middle Eastern war. Democrats, meanwhile, have accused Netanyahu of deliberately sabotaging nuclear talks to provoke a broader conflict, placing U.S. interests at risk.
The renewed Israel-Iran war has far-reaching consequences. Oil prices have surged following Israel’s strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure, including Tehran’s main gas depot, raising fears of a “stagflationary shock” to the global markets. Iran’s allies, including Hezbollah and Hamas, could escalate attacks on Israel, while Israel’s ongoing operations in Syria and Gaza and Gaza further strain regional stability. The cancellation of a UN conference on a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine-Palestinian, conflict conflict, originally scheduled for next week, reflects the broader diplomatic fallout.
Internationally, reactions vary. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin condemned Israel’s actions during a call with Trump, while the Kremlin described the Middle East as “alarming.”” UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed particular concern over attacks on nuclear facilities, urging restraint. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) echoed this, emphasizing that nuclear sites must remain untouched. However, Netanyahu’s defiance and Iran’s vow of “severe punishment” punishment, suggest neither side is inclined toward de-escalation.
The unending war between Israel and Iran, now in a perilous new phase, shows no signs of resolution. Israel’s strikes have weakened Iran’s nuclear program but strengthened Tehran’s resolve to retaliate. Iran’s missile attacks, while deadly, have not deterred Israel’s campaign, which Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon said would continue until Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities are eliminated. Trump’s warnings, intended to pressure Iran into compliance, may instead embolden hardliners in Tehran, who view U.S. support for Israel as evidence of bad faith.
For diplomacy to succeed, analysts argue Trump must credibly restrain Israel while offering Iran a face-saving path to de-escalate. Yet, Netanyahu’s domestic pressures and Iran’s ideological commitment to resisting Israel make such an outcome unlikely in the near term. As both nations trade blows, the Middle East teeters on the brink of a broader conflict, with global powers and regional actors drawn into the fray.
The world watches anxiously as the Israel-Iran conflict, fueled by renewed attacks and Trump’s warnings, threatens to spiral beyond control. Without a diplomatic breakthrough, the region risks a war not just between two rivals, but one that could engulf the entire Middle East and beyond.
