In the bustling streets of Lagos and the quiet corners of Abuja’s courtrooms, Nigeria’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is waging a relentless war against financial crime.
The Executive Chairman of the EFCC, Mr. Ola Olukoyede, recently reaffirmed that his administration will not allow public officers who corruptly enrich themselves to go unpunished.
Speaking at a three-day workshop on Anti-Corruption, Fiscal Responsibility, Transparency, and Good Governance for state and local government officials—organized by the House Committee on Financial Crimes in collaboration with the EFCC at the EFCC Academy in Karu, Abuja—Olukoyede, represented by the Commandant of the EFCC Academy, DCE Chinwe Ndubueze, stressed the agency’s commitment to accountability.
“The EFCC under my leadership will have no sympathy for public officers who breach the rules to enrich themselves or their cronies,” he stated, adding that the training aimed to instill a stronger culture of financial integrity in governance.
Despite these assurances, a glaring disparity remains in how justice is served. While cybercriminals and low-level fraudsters face swift and decisive punishment, political corruption cases often linger for years, raising concerns about selective enforcement and systemic inefficiencies.
A Tale of Two Justice Systems
In the past year alone, the EFCC secured 3,785 convictions, with a significant portion involving internet fraudsters—young men operating under aliases, defrauding victims online. Their trials are often concluded in months. In contrast, high-profile corruption cases involving billions of naira in public funds tend to drag on for years, bogged down by legal technicalities and political interference.
“The difference is striking,” a senior EFCC prosecutor noted. “A Yahoo Yahoo case takes six months. A politician’s case can stretch over a decade—if it ever reaches judgment.”
Former Petroleum Minister Diezani Alison-Madueke’s corruption trial is a prime example. Indicted in 2015 for allegedly looting billions from the nation’s coffers, her case remains in limbo, slowed by legal maneuvering.
Other high-profile politicians have faced similar delays. In one case, a former governor accused of embezzling billions negotiated a plea deal—returning only 30% of the stolen funds while avoiding serious jail time. Meanwhile, a 22-year-old cybercriminal with far less financial impact received a five-year sentence.
EFCC’s Limited Success in Political Convictions
To its credit, the EFCC has successfully prosecuted some political figures. Between 2023 and 2024, a few notable convictions included:
Shehu Nicholas Garba (Former Federal Lawmaker, Kaduna State) – Convicted for contract fraud.
Three former local government chairmen (Oyo State) – Found guilty of misappropriating public funds.
A former senator (Imo State) – Convicted in June 2024 for a ₦220 million fraud scheme.
While these cases represent progress, they remain exceptions rather than the norm. Given the scale of political corruption in Nigeria, these few convictions barely scratch the surface.
Big Cases, No Convictions—The Stalled Trials of Nigeria’s Political Elite
Despite its efforts, the EFCC has struggled to secure convictions in many high-profile cases. In 2024 alone, several former governors and ministers were arraigned, including:
Yahaya Bello (Ex-Governor of Kogi State) – Facing trial for ₦190 billion money laundering.
Willie Obiano (Ex-Governor of Anambra State) – Charged with diverting ₦4 billion in state security funds.
Darius Ishaku (Ex-Governor of Taraba State) – Accused of embezzling ₦27 billion.
Saleh Mamman (Former Minister of Power) – Under trial for ₦33 billion fraud.
Read also: Ex-militants petition EFCC over alleged ₦50bn fraud in amnesty programme
Hadi Sirika (Former Aviation Minister) – Alleged involvement in a ₦5.8 billion fraud scheme.
However, history suggests that being charged is far from being convicted. Many of these cases will likely stretch for years, with no guarantees of justice being served.
Why Do Politicians Escape Justice?
The slow pace of political corruption trials is not solely the EFCC’s fault. Several structural and systemic issues make it difficult to secure convictions against high-profile individuals:
1. Legal Loopholes and Endless Appeals
Corruption trials involving politicians rarely conclude in under five years. Defense lawyers exploit procedural loopholes, filing multiple appeals to delay proceedings. Some cases are postponed so frequently that they outlast governments, witnesses, and even public interest.
2. Political Interference
Powerful politicians often have godfathers who protect them. When administrations change, corruption cases involving allies of the ruling party are sometimes dropped or stalled.
3. The Plea Bargain Loophole
Unlike cybercriminals, politicians accused of corruption often negotiate plea bargains, returning a fraction of the stolen money in exchange for reduced penalties. While this helps recover some funds, it creates a system where stealing public funds carries minimal risk.
4. Selective Prosecution
Critics argue that some corruption trials are politically motivated, targeting opposition figures while shielding those in power. This perception erodes public trust in the anti-corruption war, reinforcing the belief that justice is unequally applied.
Can the EFCC Overcome These Barriers?
The EFCC remains one of Nigeria’s most active anti-corruption agencies, but without deep judicial reforms, independent oversight, and stronger political will, its efforts may remain largely symbolic.
Experts argue that Nigeria needs; a special anti-corruption courts to fast-track high-profile cases. Stronger judicial accountability to prevent endless delays and frivolous appeals. Tighter plea bargain regulations to ensure politicians face real consequences and Political independence for the EFCC, reducing executive influence on prosecutions.
For now, the imbalance remains stark: cybercriminals face swift and harsh justice, while corrupt politicians continue to navigate a system designed to protect them.
As the EFCC prepares to release its 2024 Annual Report, it is expected to highlight another record-breaking year for cybercrime convictions. Yet, without matching intensity in political prosecutions, Nigeria’s anti-corruption fight risks being perceived as a one-sided war—where the powerful evade accountability while the powerless pay the price.
