The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), a cornerstone of Nigeria’s fight against corruption, finds itself at the center of public outrage following a tragic incident in Anambra State. On January 17, 2025, Assistant Superintendent Aminu Sahabi Salisu, a gallant officer, lost his life during a raid to apprehend suspected internet fraudsters. The incident has ignited widespread criticism of the EFCC’s operational methods and raised important questions about law enforcement practices in Nigeria.
The events unfolded in the early hours of January 17 in Ifite, Awka, when EFCC operatives from the Enugu Zonal Command stormed a residential building as part of a mission to arrest suspected cybercriminals, colloquially known as “Yahoo boys.” Among the occupants was Joshua Chukwubueze Ikechukwu, who allegedly opened fire on the officers, killing Salisu and critically injuring another operative.
The EFCC revealed that prior to the shooting, its officers had successfully apprehended 37 suspects within the premises. However, Ikechukwu reportedly refused to cooperate, even after identifying the operatives via CCTV footage. According to the commission, Ikechukwu’s alleged involvement in cybercrime and the recovery of incriminating devices from his residence substantiate their operation.
The shooting has fueled a heated debate on social media and in the press, with many Nigerians expressing concerns over the EFCC’s approach to raids. Posts on platforms like X questioned whether the operatives adhered to proper legal procedures, including obtaining a warrant or attempting less invasive methods of arrest. Critics suggested that the raid’s timing, described as occurring in the “early hours of the morning,” could have led the homeowner to mistake the officers for intruders, particularly in a region plagued by high levels of insecurity.
The narrative gained traction as netizens accused the EFCC of prioritizing aggression over due process. A tweet by an observer asked, “If you knew his home and workplace, why wasn’t an official invitation sent? Why opt for an early morning raid in a volatile area?” Others lamented the growing distrust between law enforcement agencies and civilians, calling for better communication and transparency in operations.
The Anambra incident is not an isolated case. The EFCC has faced previous criticisms over its aggressive tactics. For instance, in 2024, an operation in Akure, Ondo State, saw operatives raiding a nightclub and arresting individuals, including a groom celebrating his bachelor’s eve. Critics argue that such heavy-handed actions erode public confidence in the agency and expose its officers to unnecessary risks.
This latest incident has amplified calls for reform. Legal analysts and civil society organizations emphasize the need for intelligence-led operations that minimize confrontations and uphold civil liberties. The use of excessive force, they argue, not only jeopardizes lives but also undermines the EFCC’s credibility.
In an official press release, the EFCC condemned what it described as “irresponsible narratives” circulating on social media. The commission clarified that the operation was conducted in accordance with standard protocols, with the raid duly documented at the Anambra State Police Command. The EFCC also refuted claims of misconduct, asserting that Ikechukwu’s actions—firing on law enforcement officers—were unjustifiable.
The statement described Salisu as a patriotic officer who paid the ultimate price in service to the nation. It further warned that subsequent attacks on EFCC operatives would be met with the full force of the law. The commission called on the public to recognize the escalating dangers posed by internet fraudsters, noting that some have resorted to armed resistance and other criminal activities, including kidnapping and ritual killings.
The Anambra killing has reopened discussions about the EFCC’s legal framework and operational ethics. Critics argue that the agency’s reliance on aggressive raids reflects systemic flaws, including inadequate training and a lack of accountability.
Read also: Sanctions await officials who pay for poorly executed, uncompleted contracts – Gov. Oborevwori
Legal experts emphasize that law enforcement agencies must strike a balance between combating crime and respecting citizens’ rights. Failure to do so, they warn, could lead to more public resistance and undermine efforts to curb corruption and cybercrime.
As Nigeria battles an upsurge in cybercrime, the need for reform in law enforcement practices has never been more urgent. Stakeholders are advocating for a shift towards intelligence-driven operations that prioritize de-escalation and civilian safety. This includes better inter-agency coordination, the use of warrants for arrests, and enhanced community engagement to foster trust.
The tragic loss of ASE II Aminu Sahabi Salisu underscores the human cost of inadequate operational strategies. It is a wake-up call for the EFCC and other law enforcement agencies to adopt measures that ensure the safety of their officers and the communities they serve.
The shooting in Anambra has become a symbol of the broader challenges facing Nigeria’s justice system. While the fight against financial crimes is essential for national development, it must be conducted within the bounds of the law. For the EFCC, this means embracing reforms that align with international best practices and rebuild public trust.
As the nation mourns the loss of a brave officer, the onus is on the EFCC to turn this tragedy into an opportunity for change. By addressing the criticisms of its operational methods, the commission can reaffirm its commitment to justice and ensure that such incidents do not recur.
The incident in Anambra is a stark reminder that the pursuit of justice must never come at the expense of the principles it seeks to uphold. For Nigeria to move forward, its law enforcement agencies must rise above controversy and embody the values of fairness, accountability, and respect for human life.
