The defamation lawsuit involving social media critic Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), against senior advocate Femi Falana and his son, Folarin ‘Falz’ Falana, was adjourned to January 23, 2025. The case, which has captured the attention of both legal observers and social media users across Nigeria, revolves around allegations of defamation stemming from online content posted by VDM.
VDM arrived at the court in traditional red attire, accompanied by a crowd of supporters, creating a vibrant scene outside the courthouse. However, the proceedings inside took an unexpected turn as the case could not proceed due to administrative delays. Justice Matthias Dawodu, presiding over the case, noted that most of the applications filed by both parties were not yet present in the court file, leading to the adjournment.
The legal battle emerged after VDM posted content online alleging that Femi Falana and Falz had received payments from Idris Okuneye, known as Bobrisky, to pervert the course of justice. These allegations led to significant backlash, with the Falanas filing for N500 million each in damages for defamation.
In previous rulings, the court had directed VDM to remove the contentious posts from his social media platforms, citing the ongoing reputational damage to the Falanas as long as the content remained accessible online. This temporary measure was intended to curb further defamation while the substantive suit was heard.
Read Also: Governor Okpebholo orders freezing of all state accounts amid financial overhaul
Today’s session, although brief, was marked by an atmosphere of anticipation. Social media posts following the adjournment indicated varied reactions. Some celebrated what they perceived as a non-loss for VDM, interpreting the adjournment as a moment of victory or at least a reprieve, while others expressed frustration over the delay in resolving the high-profile dispute.
Legal analysts have commented that this case underscores the complexities of defamation in the digital age, where statements can spread rapidly and impact reputations extensively. The delay might allow both parties time to prepare more thoroughly for the hearing, potentially leading to a more comprehensive review of the legal arguments presented.
As the case stands adjourned, observers and legal enthusiasts will now await January 2025, where it is hoped that the substantive issues will be addressed directly. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how defamation disputes involving social media influencers and public figures are handled in Nigeria.
The legal teams for both VDM and the Falanas are yet to release statements regarding the adjournment, but the public discourse continues unabated on social platforms.
