The family of detained leader of the banned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has declared that the Supreme Court is not above the constitution.
The family, which made the declaration in a statement signed by its spokesperson, Prince Emmanuel Kanu, was reacting to issues surrounding the ongoing terrorism trial of the IPOB leader.
The statement insisted that the justification for Kanu’s detention by the Supreme Court does not mean that it is not illegal.
The family urged Nigerians to stop worshipping judges and start respecting the law.
The statement read, “Many Nigerians wrongly believe the law is what the Supreme Court says it is. That’s false.
“Section 1(3) of the Constitution is clear — if any act or judgment violates the constitution, it’s void. Even the Supreme Court cannot legalize illegality.
“In criminal law, a discharge and acquittal means total freedom. Section 36(9) says no one shall be tried again for the same offence — that right is sacred and non-derogable.
“When the Court of Appeal frees someone (as was done in the case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu) because the trial court had no jurisdiction, the case is over.
Read also:
- Atiku calls for Nnamdi Kanu’s release, labels detention “deep wound on nation’s conscience”
- Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyers petition World Medical Association over failing health
- Igbo communities in Canada demand Nnamdi Kanu’s release
“You can’t continue a case that never legally existed. To attempt it is legal witchcraft — what lawyers call legal necromancy.
“Even the Supreme Court once admitted it in Ogbomor v. State (1985) — a void proceeding remains void forever. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s case is void.
“Detaining someone after discharge is illegal under both the constitution and Article 7 of the African Charter, which Nigeria has domesticated.
“So no, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s detention is not lawful because the Supreme Court said so. The constitution is supreme — not the Supreme Court. Let’s stop worshipping judges and start respecting the law.”
